Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,069,938 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.7%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 15.6% |
Range | 24.3% | 13.8% |
Mean | 8.9% | 7.1% |
Median | 8.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |