Ute vs Arapaho Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Arapaho
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Ute
Arapaho
16.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Arapaho Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,778,572 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 3.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 9.8% |
| Maximum | 66.0% | 53.9% |
| Range | 64.0% | 44.2% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 23.5% |
| Median | 15.9% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.5% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Arapaho by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Kiowa (16.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.96%), Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Yakama (16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (16.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Honduras (16.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Menominee (16.4%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Congo (16.1%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Dominica (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |