Tsimshian vs Taiwanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Taiwanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Taiwanese
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Taiwanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,221,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.8%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 0.66% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 39.7% |
Range | 34.3% | 38.3% |
Mean | 14.1% | 12.8% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Taiwanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |