Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Kiowa
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Kiowa
Czechoslovakians
22.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,050,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 22.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,841,807 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 46.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 62.5% |
| Range | 53.4% | 59.5% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 22.0% |
| Median | 22.8% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.7% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Cajun (22.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Honduran (22.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Yakama (22.1%, a difference of 0.39%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and Paiute (22.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |