Swedish vs Thai Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
 Thai
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Thais
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Thai Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,612,277 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,359,264 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.624 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 10.6%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Thai | 
| Minimum | 0.75% | 0.80% | 
| Maximum | 50.0% | 15.1% | 
| Range | 49.2% | 14.4% | 
| Mean | 11.7% | 6.4% | 
| Median | 9.7% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 8.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 2.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Thais by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.3%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 9.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.3%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 10.6%  |