Swedish vs Croatian Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Croatian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Croatians
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Croatian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,612,277 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,543,328 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.24%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Croatian |
Minimum | 0.75% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 32.2% |
Range | 49.2% | 31.2% |
Mean | 11.7% | 10.0% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Croatians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |