Swedish vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Swedish
French Canadian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Swedes
French Canadians
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
76.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,105,782 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,484,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 17.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | French Canadian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 94.2% |
Range | 97.0% | 87.1% |
Mean | 20.9% | 24.1% |
Median | 13.3% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 25.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.6% | 15.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |