Immigrants from Syria vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,156,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,484,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Syria	French Canadian
Minimum	0.70%	7.1%
Maximum	35.6%	94.2%
Range	34.9%	87.1%
Mean	16.2%	24.1%
Median	16.2%	18.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.2%	14.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.2%	25.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.0%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.7%	16.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.6%	15.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria and French Canadians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Tsimshian (16.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
French Canadians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Israelis	76.5 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Nepal	76.0 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Yugoslavians	75.9 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	74.8 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	71.3 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	71.3 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	69.6 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	51.3 /100 \| #171	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Colombia	50.8 /100 \| #172	Average 16.4%
Tsimshian	50.5 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%
Uruguayans	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	49.0 /100 \| #175	Average 16.5%