Swedish vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Swedish
Ute
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Swedes
Ute
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,105,782 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 59.1%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45074/45074fbdf401e7c3576ed24627b15fc12662aff8" alt="Swedish vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16"
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Ute |
Minimum | 3.0% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 86.0% |
Range | 97.0% | 76.9% |
Mean | 20.9% | 34.2% |
Median | 13.3% | 26.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.6% | 21.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |