Sudanese vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Sudan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Sudan
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,923,711 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.85%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 36.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 11.4% |
| Median | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Sudan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |