South African vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from China
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from China
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from China Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 24.3% |
Range | 73.0% | 22.4% |
Mean | 9.9% | 10.4% |
Median | 7.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from China by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |