Slavic vs Sri Lankan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Sri Lankan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Sri Lankans
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Sri Lankan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,042,655 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 46.6% | 62.5% |
| Range | 46.4% | 61.3% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 14.0% |
| Median | 10.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Sri Lankans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |