Shoshone vs Jamaican Family Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Jamaican
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Jamaicans
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Jamaican Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,600,445 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 37.0% |
| Range | 33.9% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| Median | 9.4% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Jamaicans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |