Salvadoran vs Jamaican Family Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Jamaican
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Jamaicans
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Jamaican Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,019,620 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 26.0% | 37.0% |
| Range | 25.3% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 11.4% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Jamaicans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |