Immigrants from Ecuador vs Jamaican Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Jamaican
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Jamaicans
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Jamaican Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,551,219 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,005,969 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.48%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Jamaican |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 37.0% |
Range | 19.1% | 34.1% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Jamaicans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |