Romanian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,686,002 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,542,922 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.9%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Romanian	Immigrants from Netherlands
Minimum	1.4%	1.0%
Maximum	34.2%	50.3%
Range	32.7%	49.3%
Mean	11.3%	11.0%
Median	8.7%	8.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.2%	6.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.1%	11.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.9%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.1%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Netherlands by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Poland (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Austria (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Canadian (9.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Australian (9.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.6 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 9.9%
Canadians	98.5 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 9.9%
Australians	98.4 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 9.9%
Samoans	98.0 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 10.0%
Yugoslavians	97.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 10.0%
Palestinians	97.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 10.0%
Russians	97.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 10.0%
Turks	97.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 10.0%
New Zealanders	97.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	97.7 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 10.0%
Whites/Caucasians	97.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	97.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 10.0%
Koreans	97.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	97.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.2 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 10.1%
Romanians	97.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.1%