Pennsylvania German vs Serbian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Serbian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Serbians
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Serbian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,066,228 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 17.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Serbian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 56.7% |
Range | 98.2% | 51.7% |
Mean | 31.6% | 21.7% |
Median | 24.5% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.6% | 27.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.1% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |