Immigrants from Western Asia vs Serbian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Serbian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Serbians
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Serbian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,084,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Serbian |
| Minimum | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 53.6% | 56.7% |
| Range | 47.2% | 51.7% |
| Mean | 20.1% | 21.7% |
| Median | 19.3% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Serbians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |