Pennsylvania German vs Sudanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Sudanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Sudanese
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Sudanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,066,228 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%, a difference of 4.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 8.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 48.2% |
| Range | 98.2% | 40.2% |
| Mean | 31.6% | 24.5% |
| Median | 24.5% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.6% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.1% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Sudanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.94%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |