Norwegian vs Danish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Danish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Danes
6.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Danish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,824,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 6.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Danish |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 36.6% |
Range | 41.1% | 33.8% |
Mean | 7.2% | 8.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Danes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |