Norwegian vs Croatian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Croatian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Croatians
6.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Croatian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,824,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,582,342 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 6.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 42.9% | 28.1% |
| Range | 41.1% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 8.9% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Croatians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |