Norwegian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Norwegian
Czech
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Norwegians
Czechs
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,210,620 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 7.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Czech |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 36.6% |
Range | 68.4% | 35.5% |
Mean | 14.7% | 14.9% |
Median | 12.6% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |