Latvian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Latvians
Celtics
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,672,016 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,451,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 24.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 72.3% | 53.6% |
Range | 71.3% | 51.4% |
Mean | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Median | 12.9% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |