Luxembourger vs Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Latvian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Latvians
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Latvian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,471,416 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,200,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 48.0% |
| Range | 10.2% | 46.0% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 10.5% |
| Median | 7.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Latvians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Czechoslovakian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |