Luxembourger vs Finnish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Finnish
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Finns
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Finnish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,471,416 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,117,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Finnish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 41.3% |
| Range | 10.2% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 10.3% |
| Median | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Finns by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Bhutanese (9.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and British (9.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |