Luxembourger vs Tlingit-Haida Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Tlingit-Haida
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Tlingit-Haida
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Tlingit-Haida Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,471,416 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,762,722 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 10.8%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 17.8% |
| Range | 10.2% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 8.0% |
| Median | 7.7% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Tlingit-Haida by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and European (9.2%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Chinese (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.7%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |