Czech vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Czech
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Czechs
Luxembourgers
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 2.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 36.6% | 50.0% |
| Range | 35.5% | 48.7% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 11.9% |
| Median | 14.5% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |