Jordanian vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Latvian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Latvians
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,479,889 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,672,016 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 12.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 72.3% |
Range | 41.4% | 71.3% |
Mean | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Median | 13.0% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Dutch (15.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chileans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |