Jordanian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Czech
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Czechs
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,479,889 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 6.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Czech |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 36.6% |
Range | 41.4% | 35.5% |
Mean | 16.0% | 14.9% |
Median | 13.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Dutch (15.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chileans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |