Japanese vs Immigrants from Jamaica Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Jamaica
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Jamaica
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
26.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Jamaica Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,508,626 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.31%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Jamaica |
Minimum | 11.5% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.3% |
Range | 88.5% | 54.9% |
Mean | 28.5% | 20.4% |
Median | 23.4% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.3% | 23.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Jamaica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |