Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Egypt
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Egypt
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Egypt Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,387,558 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Egypt |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 23.3% | 55.9% |
| Range | 23.1% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Egypt by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |