Immigrants from Western Africa vs Cherokee Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Cherokee
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Africa
Cherokee
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa vs Cherokee Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,511,733 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 61.8% |
| Range | 39.6% | 59.5% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 21.9% |
| Median | 15.1% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa and Cherokee by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |