Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Soviet Union Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Soviet Union
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Soviet Union
11.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Soviet Union Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,516,380 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,355,679 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 0.78% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 50.0% |
Range | 47.5% | 46.7% |
Mean | 13.5% | 14.0% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Soviet Union by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Bulgarian (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Cypriot (11.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Burmese (11.7%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Sri Lankan (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Korea (11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Iraq (11.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Nepalese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Samoans | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Burmese | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.7% |