Immigrants from Turkey vs Laotian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Laotian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Laotians
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Laotian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,589,899 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,550,821 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.93%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 18.7% | 16.8% |
Range | 17.0% | 15.9% |
Mean | 7.5% | 7.8% |
Median | 6.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Laotians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |