Immigrants from Turkey vs Canadian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Canadian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Canadians
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Canadian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,543 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,267,271 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.010%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Canadian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 68.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.4% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 24.7% |
| Median | 8.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 26.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Canadians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |