Immigrants from Turkey vs Canadian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Canadian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Canadians
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Canadian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,589,899 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,772,566 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Canadian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 18.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.0% | 97.7% |
Mean | 7.5% | 21.7% |
Median | 6.1% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 21.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 26.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Canadians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |