Greek vs Bulgarian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Bulgarian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Bulgarians
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Bulgarian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,993,852 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,546,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 0.65% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 95.7% | 52.6% |
Range | 95.1% | 52.3% |
Mean | 15.6% | 8.0% |
Median | 8.4% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.7% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Bulgarians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |