Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Czech
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Czechs
28.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.9%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,142,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 28.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,588,307 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 28.9%, a difference of 0.74%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 93.1% | 93.6% |
| Mean | 36.2% | 41.3% |
| Median | 32.5% | 33.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.7% | 28.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.3% | 48.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.6% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Czechs by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Austrian (28.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (28.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovene (28.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Serbian (28.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (28.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Japanese (28.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cambodia (28.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (28.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (28.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (28.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 86.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 86.1 /100 | #146 | Excellent 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Syrians | 85.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Serbians | 85.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.9 /100 | #151 | Good 28.7% |
| Austrians | 79.0 /100 | #152 | Good 28.7% |
| Slovenes | 76.4 /100 | #153 | Good 28.8% |
| Portuguese | 73.2 /100 | #154 | Good 28.8% |
| Ugandans | 71.7 /100 | #155 | Good 28.8% |
| Iraqis | 71.5 /100 | #156 | Good 28.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 71.1 /100 | #157 | Good 28.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 70.6 /100 | #158 | Good 28.9% |
| Czechs | 68.4 /100 | #159 | Good 28.9% |
| Japanese | 68.0 /100 | #160 | Good 28.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 28.9% |
| Scandinavians | 66.2 /100 | #162 | Good 28.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 65.9 /100 | #163 | Good 28.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 65.9 /100 | #164 | Good 28.9% |
| Arabs | 60.7 /100 | #165 | Good 29.0% |