Immigrants from Ghana vs Cherokee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Cherokee
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Cherokee
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Cherokee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,744,013 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 38.5% | 54.2% |
| Range | 38.0% | 50.6% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 17.8% |
| Median | 11.3% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Cherokee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |