Immigrants from Latvia vs Croatian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,031,058 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,515,977 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.13%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latvia	Croatian
Minimum	9.8%	4.0%
Maximum	100.0%	62.3%
Range	90.2%	58.3%
Mean	23.4%	18.3%
Median	13.6%	13.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.1%	11.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	28.4%	20.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.3%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.0%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.4%	12.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Croatians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Albanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ethiopian (12.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Italian (12.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 12.3%
Greeks	98.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 12.3%
Immigrants \| Italy	98.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 12.3%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	98.6 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 12.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	98.3 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	98.1 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 12.4%
Ethiopians	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 12.4%
Albanians	97.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Latvia	97.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	97.6 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 12.5%
Croatians	97.5 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 12.5%
Argentineans	97.5 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Austria	97.4 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 12.5%
Italians	97.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	97.1 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 12.5%
Norwegians	96.9 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 12.6%
Immigrants \| Armenia	96.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 12.6%
Palestinians	96.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 12.6%
Immigrants \| France	96.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 12.6%
Ukrainians	96.7 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 12.6%