Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Immigrants from Israel
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Immigrants from Israel
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,423,008 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Immigrants from Israel |
Minimum | 0.92% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 24.6% | 37.1% |
Range | 23.7% | 36.6% |
Mean | 9.8% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Israel by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |