Immigrants from Israel vs Uruguayan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Uruguayan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Uruguayans
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Uruguayan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,801,903 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,478,006 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 8.4% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 27.3% |
| Range | 54.7% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 11.3% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Uruguayans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Argentina (11.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |