Immigrants from India vs Lithuanian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Lithuanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Lithuanians
9.0%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Lithuanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,739,641 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.604 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,719,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 15.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from India | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.071% |
| Maximum | 16.8% | 29.6% |
| Range | 16.2% | 29.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 10.3% |
| Median | 5.9% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Lithuanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (9.5%, a difference of 5.6%), Thai (9.6%, a difference of 6.1%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 7.6%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |