Immigrants from Bolivia vs Lithuanian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
 Lithuanian
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Lithuanians
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Lithuanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,712,653 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,719,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.31%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Lithuanian | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.071% | 
| Maximum | 33.0% | 29.6% | 
| Range | 30.6% | 29.5% | 
| Mean | 9.4% | 10.3% | 
| Median | 8.2% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Lithuanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.3%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 10.6%  |