Polish vs Lithuanian Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
 Lithuanian
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Poles
Lithuanians
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Lithuanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,734,720 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,719,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 2.5%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Lithuanian | 
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.071% | 
| Maximum | 75.7% | 29.6% | 
| Range | 75.2% | 29.5% | 
| Mean | 12.1% | 10.3% | 
| Median | 9.2% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Poles and Lithuanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Iranian (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 10.8%  |