Immigrants from Guatemala vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,986,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,648,663 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 63.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Guatemala	Norwegian
Minimum	3.5%	3.9%
Maximum	69.0%	81.0%
Range	65.5%	77.1%
Mean	30.9%	15.5%
Median	28.1%	13.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	21.1%	10.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.9%	16.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.9%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.8%	10.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.7%	10.9%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 21.5%
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 21.6%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 21.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 21.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 21.7%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 21.7%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 21.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 22.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 22.1%
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 22.2%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 22.5%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 22.6%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 22.6%

Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%