Immigrants from Guatemala vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Zimbabweans
21.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,986,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 52.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 69.0% | 29.1% |
| Range | 65.5% | 28.8% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 11.0% |
| Median | 28.1% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.1% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.9% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |