Immigrants from Dominica vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominica
Dutch West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominica
Dutch West Indians
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominica vs Dutch West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,788,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Dominica | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 54.5% | 43.3% |
| Range | 52.1% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 19.7% |
| Median | 16.9% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominica and Dutch West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |