Immigrants from China vs Thai Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Thai
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Thais
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Thai Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,804,939 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,566,624 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Thai |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 3.8% |
| Range | 5.2% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.86% | 0.65% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Thais by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Salvadoran (2.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (2.6%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Bolivia (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Ghanaian (2.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nigeria (2.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Ghana (2.6%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 99.7 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |