Immigrants from Chile vs Mongolian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Mongolian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Mongolians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
53.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Mongolian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,282,925 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.37%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Mongolian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 28.4% |
Range | 20.6% | 27.2% |
Mean | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Mongolians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |